The popularity of pet dogs, especially breeds such as the Shih Tzu, has grown significantly in recent years. Many families consider their pets as members of the family and provide them with love, care, and medical attention.
However, there is another side to the pet industry that deserves discussion. Many prospective owners prefer female dogs over male dogs. One reason is obvious: breeding.
A Shih Tzu typically gives birth to four or five puppies in a litter. In India, depending on the bloodline, pedigree, and location, a puppy can sell for anywhere between ₹25,000 and ₹80,000 or even more. This means that a single litter can generate substantial revenue. In some cases, puppies are booked even before they are born.
At first glance, this may appear to be a profitable opportunity. But it also raises an important ethical question:
When does responsible breeding become commercial exploitation?
Veterinarians generally recommend adequate recovery time between pregnancies and limiting the number of litters throughout a dog's lifetime. These guidelines are intended to protect the health and well-being of the mother.
However, market demand can create a temptation to breed dogs as frequently as possible. Pregnancy, delivery, and nursing puppies place significant physical demands on a dog. Repeated pregnancies without sufficient recovery time can affect the animal's health and quality of life.
This leads to a thought-provoking comparison.
Many humans carefully plan their families and often wait years between children to ensure the well-being of both mother and child. Yet when it comes to animals, some people may expect repeated breeding cycles simply because there is a financial incentive. If a dog is viewed primarily as an investment that generates income year after year, are we treating it as a beloved companion or as a commercial asset?
Of course, not all pet owners fall into this category. In fact, many genuinely love their pets, treat them as family members, and never breed them for profit. Yet the existence of irresponsible breeding practices forces us to reflect on a broader question.
Many pet owners actively campaign for animal welfare, support the protection of stray dogs, and advocate for animal rights. These are admirable causes. But true animal love must extend beyond affection and advocacy. It must also include responsible ownership, ethical breeding practices, and a commitment to the physical and emotional well-being of the pet animals.
The real question is:
Do we love animals for what they are, or for what they can provide us?
The answer may reveal the difference between being a pet owner and being a true animal lover.